A person taking stock in middle age is like an artist or composer
looking at an unfinished work; but whereas the composer and the painter
can erase some of their past efforts, we cannot. We are stuck with
what we have lived through. The trick is to finish it with a sense
of design and a flourish rather than to patch up the holes or merely
to add new patches to it.
—Harry S. Broudy in Paradox and Promise: Essays on American Life
and Education (1961)
|
Ph.D., Harvard University
Professor, Philosophy of Education, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champagne
Author of Building a Philosophy of Education (1961); Paradox
and Promise: Essays on American Life and Education (1961); Democracy
and Excellence in American Secondary Education: A Study in Curriculum
Theory (1964); The Real World of Public Schools (1972); Truth
and Credibility, The Citizen’s Dilemma (1981); The Uses of
Schooling (1988).
Harry Samuel Broudy (1905–1998), a distinguished educator, scholar,
and philosopher, as well as a prolific writer, often is identified
as the most important philosopher of education in the United States
since John Dewey. One of his main interests was concern for education
in a democracy. Broudy believed that for a democracy to flourish, all
citizens must have general knowledge and moral commitment. Additionally,
Broudy studied issues centered around society’s demands on schools.
He viewed education as the common link that unites a diverse society,
and he advocated for a renewed commitment to the nation’s public schools.
In the 1970s and 1980s, Broudy wrote numerous papers and several books
that advocated for the centrality of arts education.
Broudy emigrated to the United States at the age of seven from Poland
with his parents. They settled in Milford, Massachusetts, where Broudy
attended the public schools. After high school graduation, Broudy enrolled
at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). He soon discovered,
however, that his real interests were in literature, philosophy, and
psychology, not in chemical engineering. He left MIT and worked as
a reporter for the Milford Daily News. Subsequently, he enrolled
at Boston University, where he earned his bachelor’s degree and was
valedictorian of his class. Broudy worked another three years at the
newspaper before attending Harvard University for his master’s and
Ph.D degrees.
Broudy graduated in the height of the Great Depression. Unable to find
a position as a college instructor, he worked for a year as the supervisor
of adult education for the Department of Education of the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts. In 1937, Broudy began his academic career with a
faculty position at Massachusetts State College at North Adams where
he taught psychology and philosophy. He was offered a position at Framingham
State Teachers College in 1949 and remained there until 1957, at which
time he became Professor of Philosophy of Education at the University
of Illinois.
At Illinois, Broudy gained a reputation as one of America’s leading
educational philosophers, with views based on a tradition of classical
realism, or that human nature strives for perfection. Accordingly,
Broudy held that there is common knowledge, a set of key ideas, and
learning skills that everyone should possess. This view, combined with
his emphasis on education for democracy, led Broudy to advocate for
a common curriculum for all students. This common secondary school
curriculum embodied a sampling of all knowledge organized by: the natural
sciences for knowledge about the world, the developmental studies for
knowledge about society, and the exemplars (literature) for knowledge
about the self, with a problem-solving track to practice using this
knowledge on large-scale social problems (Vandenberg 2001).
In The Uses of Schooling (1988), Broudy delineated four uses
of knowledge: replicative, associative, interpretive, and practical.
Because the ability to replicate information diminishes significantly
after formal instruction ends and because practical education only
is useful in vocational training, Broudy believed that schools should
focus their attention on the associative and interpretive uses of knowledge.
Broudy pointed out that aesthetic studies provide students with associative
and interpretive experiences and develop the capacities for interpretation
and informed criticism, as well as a richer vocabulary for self-expression.
Broudy received three honorary doctoral degrees and was a member of
the National Academy of Education, a fellow of the Center for Advanced
Study in Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University, and an advisory
board member and senior faculty member of the Getty Institute for Educators
on the Visual Arts. He also served as the editor of The Educational
Forum from 1964 to 1973, and was a member of the editorial board
of the Journal of Aesthetic Education which, in 1992, devoted
an entire issue to Broudy's contributions.
Broudy officially retired in 1974, but remained active as professor
emeritus in the College of Education. He wrote, lectured, and participated
in other educational projects until the early 1990s when Alzheimer’s
disease forced him into full retirement.
Contributed by Vanessa M. Sikes, Marble Falls High School, Marble
Falls, Texas
References
Bresler, L. 2002. Harry Broudy on the cognitive merits of music education:
Implications for research and practice of arts curriculum. Arts
Education Policy Review 103(3): 17–27.
Vandenberg, D. 2001. Identity politics, existentialism, and Harry Broudy’s
educational theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory 33(3-4):
365–80.
|